As a long-time admirer of Martin Guitar Company instruments, the prospect of owning one is always on my mind. Having recently played both a stellar HD model and my personal 1959 D-28, the vintage guitar surprisingly remained my preference. This wasn’t just any D-28; it stands out as exceptional. The crucial question became: if forced to choose only one, which would it be? Ideally, keeping both would be the dream.
My experience extends to comparing Authentic series models, specifically a 2006 D-18 Authentic, against various Model D guitars, often considered in the “Pre-War” style by enthusiasts referencing the Martin Guitar Company’s golden era.
Generalizing the tonal differences, Model D guitars tend to exhibit an older, slightly drier sound profile with a pronounced punch. Authentic models, conversely, seem to possess a touch less volume or immediate punch, leaning towards a warmer overall tone.
For my specific needs in intimate jam sessions and recording scenarios, the Authentic series edges out as the preferred choice. As a strummer, it simply resonates more deeply. To my ears, it embodies the quintessential “Martin” sound. While a Model D might be deemed the objectively “better” guitar, particularly in louder group settings, a certain thinness in the treble frequencies has always been a minor drawback for me. Interestingly, fellow musicians often expressed a preference for the D-18 Authentic in playing situations.
From my perspective, rosewood back and sides enhance the D-style Martins. However, comparing a Madagascar rosewood Authentic to a Brazilian rosewood Pre-War style Model D isn’t a direct comparison. For a more equitable assessment, sticking with mahogany Authentics when evaluating against mahogany Pre-War style instruments is advisable.
Ultimately, the ideal scenario? Owning both. When delving into this level of nuanced guitar preference, experiencing both styles firsthand is truly the only definitive way to discern individual preference within the esteemed Martin Guitar Company lineup.
